"I mean what They and Their psychiatrists call 'delusional systems.' Needless to say, 'delusions' are always officially defined." --Capt. Geoffrey "Pirate" Prentice, Gravity's Rainbow
"Well, that's, like, just your opinion, man." --The Dude, The Big Lebowski

Saturday, December 22, 2012

The Greatest Novels of All Time!, Or Some Contemporary Novels I Liked


          Occasionally someone—a friend, a relative, even a student—does something really weird: they ask me what they should read, presumably because I teach English, right? Normally, I am so caught off guard that I don’t know how to respond. Are they asking me for what they should read for their enjoyment? Am I going to have any idea of what they might enjoy? Are they asking me what they should read…you know, to be well read? Or to just seem well read? And am I even a fit judge? Ah, who cares…I dream up such lists all of the time: they’re called syllabi.
But way back during my undergraduate days, I sheepishly admitted to a prof at UCSD that I just wasn’t all that well read. He laughed and said, “Don’t worry: you will be.” And by god, he was right. And here’s how it happened: simply put, I just started reading…a lot…like habitually. Or as Naomi Lebowitz used tell students about writing essays, it’s just like eating a mammoth sized bowl of spaghetti. You eat a few bites and it still seems just as daunting a task.  But if you keep after it and quit worrying about your progress one day you’ll be really fat and have sauce all over your face. Er…you know what I mean.
Anyhow, I’m considering a multipart guide here, and how far I go with it will depend upon how interested you and I remain in the topic. At some point I will tackle some classics; I will make the case for some authors that you’ve never heard of; and I might offer thoughts on how to approach some of the more intimidating fields of readership, like Shakespeare. But we shall see… First thing’s first. I don’t know where you are as a reader. I’m going to assume that you “like to read” or you wouldn’t be much interested in this post at all. And some of you have read far more deeply and differently than I have. For those eggheads, just take all this as my humble reflections on books and stuff.
Now for our first entry, I’d like to encourage my fellow readers to consider trying a book that isn’t something you’d normally read. Maybe it’s longer than your usual, or maybe it’s different in style or subject matter. As you’ll see, I like my books like I like my sex: long, hard, and fictional. In addition, maybe you have read and enjoyed one of the books on the following list. If so, maybe you’ll take my concurrence with your taste as reason to give one of the others a go. So here’s my first list: there are seven books on it (because I’m against doing ten upon ethical grounds) and in no particular order.... Let’s call it, “Contemporary Novels Aaron Has Read in the Last Year and Enjoyed Immensely” [continued after the jump]:

Sunday, December 16, 2012

'Cross'-Purposes in Ben-Hur


Despite the tragedy in Connecticut (which, as the father of 5-year-old, I feel no ability to comment upon further), I sat down on Friday to prepare for this post by watching Ben-Hur. As I’ve noted in a previous post, Charlton Heston has proven a particularly difficult figure for me to like as a result of his desperate and bitter advocacy for white, heterosexual, Christian men as well as his unnuanced and extremist promotion of the NRA. And yet I love his films, especially Orson Welles’ Touch of Evil and the SciFi classic The Planet of the Apes. He’s a great actor from a great age of Hollywood cinema.
Though Heston was once a Democrat who supported JFK (and RFK) for President, some of Heston’s iconic films go as a far as to promote a conservative ideology. The parting ofthe Red Sea in The Ten Commandments is most certainly a landmark achievement in film…yet it’s one—yaawwwn—that I can do without. But then there’s my favorite Heston film: Ben-Hur. It’s simply the greatest epic film ever made. Problem is that the epic backdrop is one with which I have a clavicle or two to pick: Ben-Hur’s struggle for freedom in the Roman Empire is set against the story of Jesus Christ. In fact, the film begins with the Nativity and neglects to introduce the title character for more than 20 minutes (for the sake of comparison, by the same point in Diehard, Hans Gruber had already taken over Nakatomi Plaza). The film (and novel upon which it is based) is even subtitled A Tale of the Christ. Hurm. What to do? I don’t really have a problem with Jesus. In fact, I kinda like the dude. Besides, he’s dead anyhow and can’t do any further good nor ill. So it goes. It’s living breathing Christians that frustrate me to no end.
All you war-on-Christmas lamenting, single-issue voting, vaginal ultrasound promoting, ‘traditional’ marriage protecting, children’s crusading, grand inquisitor trusting, sweater vest sporting, generally judgmental people annoy the fuck out of me. I know, I know. Not all Christians are right-wing fundamentalist fascist assholes. But your political avatars sure are, and Rick Santorum makes we want to throw up everything I ever ate in my whole life. What Christian leaders ever advocate voting liberal? I can’t think of any even one though Jesus was, in fact, a hippie born in a barn who preached against materialism and handed out free stuff to poor people...like food and healthcare. But none of that is Christian in a theocratic political rhetoric obsessed with two issues: abortion and gay marriage. And here I thought that Jesus was all about passivism and curing sick people and feeding the hungry, or that’s what they told me in Bible school anyhow. But based on the public discourse of Christianity, I guess I was wrong. It’s kinda made it hard for me to like anything to do with Jesus. And that’s the problem I’m coping with here during this era of the Cold Civil War. Even though I’ll never be a Christian I’d sure like to be okay with the fact that you are.
And yet, despite all of my issues with Christians and Heston and the NRA, I somehow managed to sit down and watch Ben-Hur. After all, ‘tis the season… Sh. Quiet. It’s coming to an end. [continued after the jump]

Monday, December 10, 2012

Love Parts: A Tabloid Fantasy...


I can’t for the life of me remember what we were watching on television, but I can remember what we talking about…which is pretty weird if you think about it. Anyhow, sometime after the Thanksgiving feast, I informed my parents that one of my childhood friends was going through a divorce. It happens. In fact, it seems to be the thing to do these days. I wouldn’t exactly know. I’m not married. Never have been. Probably never will be.
          Of course, my mother and brother offered platitudes, but I wondered whether my father had even heard me. He seemed entirely occupied with channel surfing until, all of a sudden, he decided to offer his two cents…as he is wont to do….
          “I never liked that guy.” Funny, I hadn’t realized he’d ever met my friend’s estranged husband. “He though he was real hot shit.” He did? I met the guy once…I think. The only impression I ever had of him was that he didn’t make much of an impression. He was like some white dude with some hair. And he had eyes and clothes and stuff. Oh, and he ate…I definitely remember him eating. But never mind all of that.
          The old man was on a roll. He proceeded to sketch out a quite fascinating character. The old man presumed knew to know this type, the type that starts of nice then slowly devolves into mental abuse soon to be followed by “a little smacking around.” It reminded me of something out of Dostoyevsky. Boy. You woulda thought this guy woulda made more of an impression on me. Of course, he was most certainly “fucking around,” probably even “spending a lot of jack on some young girlfriend,” maybe even "in hock" over it. Okay. That's enough. This has gone too far. Someone has to say something. ...Hey! I’m someone! [continued after the jump]

Friday, December 7, 2012

The Politics of Fandom; or, The Boots are All Reverbed Out


Those who know me will know that I have very little to be disappointed about with regards to the recent elections. Having said that, I found myself often disappointed in process of the campaign. The whole way it all went down. You know. The usual liberal complaints. Money seemed to dominate the nature of the discourse. The media promoted horse races and conventional thinking rather than raising new issues. No one advocated for peace. Or civil liberties. Or gun control. Or proposed any new ideas to address the crisis in K though 12 education. Or the environment. Or poverty.
Instead we got a whole lotta fear and loathing. Fear and loathing. Fear and loathing. Blah blah blah.
But now is the winter of our discontent as we go through the Reconstruction phase of our Cold Civil War. So nothing—no nothing—disturbed me further than the incoherent diatribe offered by one of my heroes at the Republican National Convention. I mean, I knew Clint Eastwood was a Republican…but I didn’t know he was one of those Republicans. Maybe I was in denial, but after he starred in a Chrysler commercial during that last Super Bowl, I just assumed that he was the sort of centrist GOPer who took one look at the Tea Party and said, “Thanks, but no thanks. I’ll be quietly voting for Obama this time. Call me back when y’all finish your deprogramming.” But alas…in a performance which awkwardly evoked all of my dead grandparents at once he engaged in a garbled angry tussle with an empty bar stool. Oh well. [continued after the jump]

Saturday, September 8, 2012

Are You Better Off?




            We call the politicians who hold elected office our “leaders.” And just maybe that’s what is wrong with America. The guy I voted for last time around inspired us to “hope” and convinced us to make a “change,” a change of party and culture. The problem is that “hope” and “change” are not policies: they are concepts, one-word concepts to shape the brand “Obama.” It's just marketing. The guys he runs against always seem to be for “freedom” or “country first” or “believing in America.” Maybe you voted for McCain, or maybe you plan to vote for Romney. Anyhow, we probably vote with a more similar attitude than you realize. We pull lever for the empty term and then expect the empty term to make America just peachy. We decide that, when candidates say “freedom” or “hope,” they understand that term exactly as we do, exactly as all Americans do, and that we will get freedom and hope.
            But that’s not how it works. The thing that gives me hope may dash yours, and your freedom may come at the expense of mine.

Sunday, August 19, 2012

But Seriously...LOL


            In the realm of technology, I tend to be something of a luddite, a person who is comfortable with the way things are and reluctant to jump into anything “tech-y” with both feet.  While I was an early adopter of the cell phone (summer 1999), I didn’t buy a smart phone until earlier this year. My first CD player? Christmas, 1990. In fact, I went off to college in 1993 without a personal computer.  When I changed majors from biology to English, I liberated an electronic typewriter from my parents’ home office.  That was 1996. But since I’m in the education game, I've come to terms with the fact that I need to get on board with new technologies before my colleagues start whispering about my peculiar relationship with my overhead projector.
            Having said that, once I take on a new technology I tend to run with it. I check my phone a couple times an hour these days. I visit four or five websites on a daily basis. And after a friend convinced me to create a Facebook profile in 2008, I began an obsession with “sharing” my “status,” pictures of my daughter, videos for songs I’m diggin at the time, and, most often, politicizing. I am a political junky...have been since the ’84 election. I was probably the only nine-year old in Chesterfield that had a resentment against Ronald Reagan. And when my senior-year American Civ teacher asked if anyone in class knew who Bob Packwood was, I was, of course, the only student who could name the then Senator from Oregon; he'd recently had to resign because he was sexually harassing his female aides, I informed the class.
            Politics is an important part of my actual, real life personality. Not surprisingly, it is also a part of my virtual personality. I post any interesting articles I read, news clips I see, and, yes, I used to (like three months ago...ahem...okay! okay! it was like last month) get in stupid debates in comment threads. But after reading Stephen Greenblatt’s Pulitzer Prize winning book on Lucretius and the epicurean philosophy, I’ve been tempted to recede from the electronic, and hence political, world...just a bit. But who am I kidding? It’s election season!
            And, besides, what else would I do on Facebook?
            Apparently, this usage of Facebook is not appreciated by all of my “friends.” Recently, I have come across status updates that say something like, “Facebook used to be fun. Now everyone just posts politics and news.” I’m tempted to chime in…to chide you for being such a frivolous person...but that's your business so I resist that temptation…tho maybe I’m giving into it here…in this blog post. Why?
            Over the past couple of days I’ve been doing my small part to dispel the lie that President Obama’s Affordable Care Act (commonly referred to as “Obamacare”) cuts hundreds of billions of dollars from Medicare. I know full well just how much you care about that important issue. (This point of policy is not the point of this post, so if you want my take, just ask. I anticipate an overwhelming number of inquiries, so please be patient. I'm understaffed.) In response to my posting of an enlightening editorial in The New Republic treating the Romney-Ryan campaign's hypocrisy on the issue, one of my “friends” added the following comment: Can't you just start a blog and leave all of us carefree Facebookers in peace?” 
             Oh, the irony. Anyone who is friends with me in any way, shape, or form knows that I write a blog (very occasionally these days…more on that in a note at the bottom).
            Of course, I found this highly insulting, but that wouldn’t provoke me to write a blog post. More to the point is that Facebook is an open forum, a place for me to be me and you to be you…virtually.  Seemingly, this individual felt that I had violated some unwritten rule of Facebook. Odd, dontchya think? Still, I am wondering what Facebook is for? Did I violate some rule? What is Facebook's purpose? Dunno… Dunno… Some of my “friends” I don’t even know, and some of my closest associates in real life aren’t on the book. And does any of my Facebook ranting on taxes or infrastructure or foreign conflicts or  human rights or debt debacles do any good? Dunno… Dunno… There probably is no single answer to these questions.
And, just as interestingly, people often use Facebook in ways that irk me too. Yet, I have found a way—actually quite a few ways—to cope with the horrifying experience of laying eyes on a somewhat annoying post. Here goes:

1.      You can accept that people are going to post things that annoy you and move on to the posts you are interested in.  This is what I do when you post pictures of your cat. Or when you share a meme that glosses over a complex aspect of being with a sappy and sentimental cliché. Or, in a subtype of the preceding, you post a quotation from the Bible. Or anything else you post that makes me feel a little embarrassed for you.

2.      You can “hide” posts from individuals who habitually post things that annoy you.  You will remain “friends,” and they will never know that their posts never see the daylight of your news feed. This is what I do when you continually post pictures of your cat or habitually try to get me to come see your country band or post “status” updates that amount to telling me that you are buying milk or are cleaning your apartment or car or are headed to the doctor…again and again and again. This is a great option when you don’t want to insult someone by utilizing the tactical nuclear weapon of social networking, which leads me to…

3.      You can defriend people. That’s right. You can defriend people.  This is what I do when people say something I find downright offensive. Unless I am blatantly confronted by your racism or sexism or homophobia, I will probably not say anything. But if you post something racist, I will probably defriend you.  This is what I did to the asshole who told me to start a blog.  And you know what, if I offend you with my posts, you can feel free to defriend me. Agreed?

There. Now I hope we all feel better. Now I can return to my crusade to save the world from the evil forces of Right Wing Extremism and you are now armed with the skills to avoid my crusade. And I will likewise remain blissfully ignorant of just how cute your cat is because I fucking hate cats. Have a nice day.

[Note: I realize posts have been rare these months. I will continue to update The Manic Room when I have something to say, but I am currently engulfed in other creative projects. Thanks for reading.]

Monday, May 7, 2012

A Castle in Brooklyn, or Hip-Hop Heaven


            When Whitney Houston died of a drug overdose some weeks back, her passing inspired the sort of public mourning that makes my skin crawl. I mean, what was so great about her that her passing was any more significant than any other stiff listed in the obits that day?  And, more to the point: did you seriously grieve at her passing? Were you filled with melancholy? I was dubious on all points. She led a train wreck of life, and her death seemed little more than TMZ fodder. So, why is it that I now find myself participating in public mourning over the passing of Adam “MCA” Yauch? Good question. [continued after the jump]

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Mental Ginger


As this is my first visit to The Manic Room, I will start slowly. Perhaps this post is a response to the last post, containing an answer to the question posed, "Who is going to crack through our oblivion?" I also envision this writing as a "how-to." Before I launch fully into the substance of this writing, let me give you a preview of the how-to that will be contained herein: following reading this essay, you will be able to listen to "Smells Like Teen Spirit" as you've never heard it before.
I begin with a brief anecdote. I remember sitting in the parking lot of a local laundromat at Rose and Lincoln in Venice, California. Considering what comes next it, it must've been 2004. Looking across the lot, I saw a blue Ford Aerostar minivan, a child sitting in the shotgun seat, windows rolled down, his mother not there. The child was listening to the radio. As it was the summer of 2004, of course he was listening to "Hey Ya" by the Outkast.



The song had just begun and the child was already bored. It was the end of the summer and clearly he had heard the song hundreds of time. I watched him flip through the radio stations, pausing for a second on each station to hear the endless dribble issuing forth from mainstream radio. The child cycled through the entire dial and returned to you "Hey Ya." I literally watched him shrug and the begin bobbing his head to what is arguably the catchiest tune of this generation. [continued after the jump]

Saturday, March 3, 2012

Down the Rabbit Hole...



In my previous post—yes! I know it’s been a while—I remarked on the centrality of Baudrillard’s notion of hyperreality in The Matrix, the most successful film by the Wachowski brothers—er…siblings. The film was a commercial success and, as many commercial successes will, became the target of much criticism. Admittedly, some of the acting just isn’t very good…and, yet, the film is so good as to more than make up for what is normally a crippling deficiency in filmmaking. But more to my point is that some of the criticism misses the key point of the film, indeed of most science fiction: SciFi isn’t about the Future or the Alien or the Technology or the Other—it’s about us, here and now.
Ya see, intellectual critics of The Matrix—and, to be clear, I am defending only of the first film, and not the sequels, which strike me as not much more than a money grab—like to argue that the Wachowskis misapply Baudrillard’s theory.  They argue that the movie asserts a “real world,” one which Neo can see with his “real eyes,” one to which Morpheus—in an unforgiveable act of bad faith—misapplies the Baudrillardian term “the desert of the real.”  Maybe they are correct.  The movie relies upon notion of “good guys” and “bad guys”: Neo—the messianic “one”—is the messenger of Truth; the “good guys” aim to bring humans back to a reality. And, of course, notions of objective morality, truth, and reality are quite inconsistent with just about any post-structural theory, Baudrillard’s included.  But bear with me for a moment as I attempt to delineate how the film—upon reflection—works to offer a Baudrillardian critique of our culture. [continued after the jump]

Monday, February 20, 2012

Knock, Knock, Neo. The Matrix Has You...


            Performance reviews are never really enjoyable; in the teaching biz they can be downright harrowing. Normally, someone in a position of authority sits in on your class. You give them a lesson plan ahead of time and then they judge you based upon what you do in one class on one day. Moreover, as one of my colleagues like to say, teaching an English class is kinda like playing jazz: it involves a lot of improvisation, a lot of riffing off the vibe thrown out by your class mates. Some days, the students and I, we’re groovin’ to same vibe; other days…well, we’re havin’ creative differences. So how can one person really judge what I do by sitting in one day, watching us, messin’ up our dynamic? Well…they can’t. 
I had some really bad experiences with performance reviews when I taught high school. The administrators saw what they wanted to see, and they wanted to see that I was bad at my job. Why? Simply put: I didn’t fit in. Was I bad? Well, I wasn’t good: I was a first year teacher. While I’m still no “master teacher,” I’m a lot better and I think I’ll continue to improve.
Observations and performance reviews at my current job have been an entirely positive experience. Still, I will never quite get over the trauma of a politicized version of the process that surpassed the paranoid fantasies of my most nightmarish visions of “observation.” —They! Are! Watching!— So, even as I accept that we need some quality control, at some level I will always consider the corporate performance review as just another manifestation of post-modern bullshit, another example of what Jean Baudrillard calls “simulacra.”
Who is Jean Baudrillard?  What are simulacra? Funny you should ask that, because Baudrillard’s work was at the center of a class that I taught just last week, a lesson that was the subject of…an observation!

Sunday, February 12, 2012

You Haven’t Seen The Graduate?!



            One of my coworkers likes to tease me about my reaction when she has not seen a film I deem iconic. You haven't seen Miller's Crossing?! But these days I use one of her favs, The Graduate, Dustin Hoffman’s first notable appearance in our mass culture, as the central text of my pre-collegiate, developmental writing course. I ask students to complete a number of descriptive exercises leading to a descriptive essay. I used to ask the students to compose an analysis of the role of one image in the film, but I’m scaling back, allowing them to be a bit more general. I’ve learned that developmental writers just need to put sentences together, and yet I can’t help wonder whether my students are able to identify with Ben.
Young people today are just so…odd. You wonder how they achieve any complex psychological understanding given that they’re perpetually hooked into their newfangled texty machines. I know, I know: every generation finds a certain, sick comfort in denigrate the next. Kids these days! But, seriously, do these ‘Millennials’ ever even cease enjoying commodities long enough to realize that they’re unsatisfied by them? I wonder. And, yet, they still seem to identify with Ben...at least for the moments during class when I make them put away their goddamn phones. Don't make me take that phone away!
But who am I to judge? I hate to admit it, but I didn't see Mike Nichols’ classic until serving as a graduate teaching assistant for film courses at Washington University. In my defense, our access to media was far more limited in the dark ages of the late 20th century.  Back in my day, when you subscribed to HBO, you got exactly one (1) channel. Streaming? Nope. Netflix? Nope. Blockbuster had some older films, but if they weren’t in stock, you were S.O.L. Of course, some ghetto theatres that played older films (remember? they used to charge a buck). In the good ol’e days you had to actively seek out media, and I guess The Graduate never made it to the top of my list.
Hal B, AP, & CT
Then I went to college: my roomie, Hal B., and I didn’t even have a television in our dorm room freshman year. And cable wasn’t even available in the on-campus apartments that we lived in sophomore year. That year Hal B. and G-Regulator, J-Money, CT, and I got our hands on a VCR and amassed enough tapes to establish a satisfying rotation. We self-medicated, ate microwave burritos or mac-and-cheese out-of-the-box, and watched Coming to America, Star Wars, Up in Smoke, Dazed and Confused, and Fasttimes at Ridgemont High over and over and over again. 
Hal B, AP, CT, G-Regulator, J-Muny
I know that I remember those times as happier for me than they were…but that’s how I remember them through the lens of nostalgia. We smoked and drank home-brewed beer and listened to new grunge albums and went to parties and concerts.  I don’t know…maybe I wasn’t happy, but I felt alive and young. That’s for sure. Or maybe I was happy and I just didn’t know it. And then junior and senior year went pretty much the same way and then I graduated…with ‘high honors’ and rather vague plans about going to graduate school….
But that could wait.  I was going to take a year off to travel.  I had already travelled quite a bit, but I wanted to hunker down in this great place in the Spanish Basque country, this little jet-setting jewel of a town the likes of which one only finds in Latinate regions: San Sebastian.  And it was more of the same there.  Parties and shenanigans and, for the first time really for me, girls. Parties and girls. That’s really all I was really interested in when I was 22 and 23. I lived to revel. Can you blame me? Hey, at least I read a lot during the day (on the beach…while drinking beer and smoking). Okay: so, admittedly, I had issues. And I had limited funds.  So, ultimate I had to cut my “year” of travel short…by eight months…and I did the one thing that was never in my post-collegiate playbook: I moved back in with my parents.
I spent weeks lying around depressed, just drinking beer.  And then I got a job…and stayed depressed…and kept drinking beer. I won’t bore you with the details, but moving back home is productive in only one capacity: it compels young people to move forward in life, to mature, to make some feeble steps toward adulthood.  Eventually I paid off my debts, earned a pretty sweet deal at Wash U, and moved into my very own apartment.
And little did I know that along the way I had imitated art, had spent a Benjamin Braddock-like summer coming to terms with my own lack of clarity for my own life, had (contrary to every thought running through my pea-brain) experienced the grand irony of joining with the mass of human experience in my abject post-adolescent feelings of isolation and alienation, of the absence of any option in life that seemed ‘mine.’ Imagine my amazement when, among my first teaching assignments, I first laid eyes on Nichols’ film.
Not only does The Graduate narrate the story of coming to terms with the end of one’s adolescence – I’ve done that well enough right here. Rather, the film perfectly figures – in extensive use of motif and metaphor the fundamental alienation of integration with our adult world as well as the emptiness of maturation. That is, there really is no answer for the loss of one’s youth other than to accept that it’s just gone. From the opening credits to the closing shots of the film, The Graduate is a seamless and focused expression of the melancholy inherent in getting older. And, yet, it’s funny.  Really, really funny.
The film opens with a close-up of Ben’s characteristically catatonic gaze as he waits to deplane at LAX. And from that moment on, I could write a paragraph or two about nearly every shot in the film. The film is not ‘perfect’ in its artistry, but even its imperfections lend the film a charm and awkwardness characteristic of its protagonist, and, more importantly, of its viewer.  For I suppose that the very reason that this film is so important to myself and others is that each image of Benjamin is like an uncanny mirror into the past – Benjamin is the viewer.
As the credits roll, Simon & Garfunkel’s “Sounds of Silence” begins to play. Ben, wearing a dark suit, is pulled along on an airport people-mover. Framed to right of the screen, he does not walk forward, as do a handful of blurry figures in the foreground.  The credits appear in front of the white, cinder-block wall that forms the background on the left of the frame. 
Toward the end of the credits, the scene cuts to a piece of black luggage moving along a conveyor belt; of course the luggage is also framed to right of the screen and also in front of a white wall over which appear credits. And if the visual metaphor has not sufficiently impressed itself upon the viewer a sign reading “Do they match?” appears in the foreground.  Of course, Ben retrieves this piece of luggage at the end of the shot. So, before we’ve had a word of dialogue, Nichols has effectively established the fundamental reluctance and lack of agency with which Ben approaches his future.
As “Sounds of Silence” ends, a shot of Ben leaving the airport dissolves to a rather gloomy close-up of our protagonist, gloomy in both mood and outward appearance. The details of the shot set-up are important. The high-contrast lighting leaves pools of light along one side of Ben’s face.  His skin wears a sheen of perspiration, and his eyes gaze off into a nothingness below the plane of the shot. A large aquarium forms the entire background of the shot, lending the impression that Ben’s head is actually under water. A small harpoon-wielding scuba diver decorates the aquarium’s habitat. The only sound we hear is that of the aquarium’s filter bubbling. Ben himself sports neatly parted hair and a shirt and tie drawn to. Since he is lying back in bed, the tie further constricts his neck. Many other details of the ensuing shot work to underscore Ben’s general apprehension to live a life of expectations laid out for him by his parents, emblems of post-WWII parenthood.  But the most intriguing element of this opening shot is how perfectly it establishes the central motif of the film: water.  In what follows, I doubt very much that I’ll say anything new. In fact, let's just call my analysis plagiarism with a purpose: I just want to compel you to feel the value of this film, to watch it, or to watch it again, and to understand just how special a film it is. It would be a shame to let such a treasure drown in the over-abundance of media available to us in this age. So, go on and click "read more"...

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Davidson's Wholesale Retraction


            Today at school one of my Students came by my Office, which is pretty darn Odd considering that it’s only Week Three. The young Woman strutted in like she owned the Place: “So, word on the street is that you love Mitt Romney.” Turns out that she’s pretty Sharp and knows how to use Google and read my previous Blog entry.  Well, at least she’s reading some high quality Prose in her spare Time. 
Anyhow, the whole Experience got me thinking. Should I, as a molder of youngish Minds, publically express political Opinions?  Maybe not.  I do like Students to work through their Ideas for themselves, and Lord knows I held some knuckleheaded Beliefs in my early 20s, beliefs that I would still hold had some Adult tried to convince me that I was Wrong.
In addition, I began to think that I might be hurting some of my Conservative Friend’s feelings.  Yeah, crazy: I have some conservative Friends, a fact more shocking than that I have conservative Family…coz you know what they say about picking Friends and Family.  And, of course, my Intention had been anything but to Offend.  I merely wanted to promote the Notion that ultimately a Liberal could consider Mitt Romney just as undesirable a President as Newt Gingrich.  I was attempting to lend Peace to the Fringe of the GOP base. Still, in comparing the later to Satan and the former to Jeffrey Dahmer, I may have jumped the shark so to speak.  As a result, I offer the following Retraction:
Firstly, Newt Gingrich is not Satan; he is clearly a Mortal Man no better than the Least among us.  I mean one would have to be quite Mortal in order to pursue Impeachment of President Clinton for the Monica Lewinsky Affair whilst as the same time cheating on one’s second Wife with one’s third Wife.  But of course, the prosecution of President Clinton had nothing at all to do with sexual mores or appealing to values voters: Gingrich came after Clinton because he lied to a Federal Investigator, Kenneth Starr. Does anyone know why Starr was Investigating the President's personal Life?  Hmm...  Anyway, lying to a Special Prosecutor is pretty bad.  Clinton had said that he didn’t have Sex with Lewinsky.  But he kinda didn't have sex with Lewinsky; I mean, Sex involves placing one’s…  Well you get the point.  But still, that Impeachment had Nothing at all to do with Sex.  Just like calling Barack Obama the "Entertainer in Chief" or the "Food Stamp President" and offering to visit the NAACP to offer them Jobs instead of Food Stamps has nothing to do with Race.  Nothing at all…
Secondly, Mitt Romney is not only NOT a serial Killer: he’s not even a more mundane form of Sociopath.  He believes in Stuff.  You know, like stuff with Values and Principles and stuff.  In fact, he’s so wrapped up in Values that he donated more Money to his Religion – the Mormon Church – than he paid in Taxes last year…and that’s not a joke about Mitt not paying his fair share.  Mitt Romney gave more than one million dollars to the Mormon Church last year. You see: he has Values.  Good old fashion Christian Values.  You know, like believing the Second Coming has already happened…here in America.  You see Joseph Smith found these gold tablets and...well…never mind.  Anyhow, the Mormons believe in good old fashion values, Paternalistic Values, a Father centered family…if you know what I mean.  And some of those Fathers – most of which have only one Wife despite what you’ve heard – get to become Church Elders.  And they even allowed African Americans to serve as Elders as far back as the Dawn of the Civil Rights Movement…way back in 1978. And these Elders are great men: some of them have even heard of Feminism. And then they’ve some really core American beliefs involving Missionary work and Alcohol and Caffeine and...Underwear….  So, Mitt is clearly no Sociopath: he’s a Man of good old fashioned American Mormon Values.
In sum, I apologize to my Students, my Friends of all Parties and Factions, my Family, and, most of all, the Candidates themselves.  I should not have besmirched your Honor nor descended into Name-Calling.  I’m very sorry. I only wish the Candidates could be so Contrite.  Did you hear that Newt did not concede Florida? did not call Mitt to congratulate him on his Victory? in fact that he did just about everything he could to aver that he was in the Race until the Bitter End?  Can you say third party bid, Newt?  This is gonna be great!

Monday, January 30, 2012

Ire of Newt, Claw of Mitt


This term I am fortunate enough to have drawn Brit Lit I, and it is my intension to expose my students to portions of one of the most, if not the most, important epic in the English language: John Milton’s Paradise Lost. According to Christian mythos, about seven or eight Millennia ago (give or take a begat), Lucifer, the Fallen Angel, swam across the great Chaos from the fire and brimstone of Pandemonium to a Paradise on our own Earth.  Upon arrival he took the form of a Serpent and persuaded Eve to partake of the Forbidden Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.  It is for this transgression that we are cast out by the Almighty into a world of Toil and Trouble.  And it is also for this transgression that Snakes and Serpents are required to slither along the Earth, for in those times they are said to have walked upon legs.
Now, why Eve opted for Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge, I could never quite figure out.  I mean, there was another tree in Paradise: the Tree of Life.  And one thing I could really go for is more Life and less Knowledge. Oh well. Maybe she was hungry. Or maybe I should just accept that the Devil made her do it. Lord knows I’ve used that excuse….
And not coincidentally, it is only with such logic that I can explain the return to political significance of the aptly amphibiously handled Newt Gingrich: the Old Fellow made us do it. Now, if you are at all familiar with the author’s politics, you might guess that I would regard the prospect of a Gingrich Presidency with an overwhelming mixture of revulsion and fear. You would be wrong. In fact, this Serpent on legs might be just what America and the world need to get back on track. I mean, if arguing against straw men, stereotyping marginalized groups, insulting the opposition, and generally inciting fear and hatred in order to win, win, WIN isn’t good enough to fix our problems…then I fear we are beyond Salvation. But I’ll have to save a more extended case supporting a Gingrich Presidency for a future blog.  For our concern here is not whether Newt’s return should happen, whether or not it is Good News; rather I am merely stating that Newt’s return has happened and that it matters.
In fact, a week ago I was prepared to proclaim the nomination of Salamander Grinch a mere formality. He was surging in both the national and Florida polls.  And, let’s face it, Mitt Romney is the political equivalent of Michael Bolton: as long as he’s in the background no one notices, but as soon as someone turns up the volume the chorus shrieks, “Turn that shit off!... Now!”  And, hey, for all the toxicity of Cynops, the firebelly Newt, no one would ever condemn this half-man/half-serpent as anything less than entertaining. I mean, despite Milton’s best intentions, Satan steals the Epic…and it is for this reason that William Blake once said that “Milton was of the Republican Party without having known it.” Can you imagine the sorts of galling insults that the Gingrich campaign would have trotted out in an attempt to beat President Obama? My guess is that by the time November rolled around, Stephen Colbert’s parodies of SuperPAC attack ads would have seemed quite sober by comparison.
But, alas, Newt seems poised to lose tomorrow.  It seems that the Serpent’s lisp has not succeeded in seducing us sufficiently… SSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssssss….
But never fear folks.  For those of you who hate the Kenyan, European, Socialist, Fascist, Jeremiah Wright lovin’ Muslim Obama, the GOP has something for even better than Newt fucking Gingrich: Mitt Romney.
I know, I know. He’s boring. But hear me out.
Ya see Satan is Evil. He has a moral code…whereas Mitt has none. Whatever you need him to say he believes to get elected, that’s what he will say.  He will distance himself from Reagan and then extol Reagan. He will sign RomneyCare and then oppose ObamaCare. He is pro-choice then pro-life. He's for Senate Bill 5 and then against it.  ...that’s just off the top of my head. And the challenge isn’t in any attempt to figure out what he really believes, because Mitt Romney doesn’t believe anything at all...other than that he should win. Mitt Romney is even better than Evil: he’s a Sociopath.  Children, he’s the ultra-rich son of Governor that’s been running for President longer than my daughter has been alive. Not only does he not care about the poor: he has no concept of the problems that they face, and, even better, he doesn’t care. And really, what’s worse than hating the Other?  I’d say that it’s just not giving a shit about them.  Satan wanted God and Man to feel like he felt. Boring old Jeffrey Dahmer didn’t hate anybody: he just wanted to molest your corpse and then eat you. 
Come on GOP!  You don’t want to make liberals miserable. Hello!  Been there, done that. Does George W. Bush ring any bells?
No, no. You want to cut us out entirely…and then molest our corpses…and then eat us.  That’s the only suitable revenge for our having elected an African-American moderate to the Presidency.  Romney 2012.

Monday, January 9, 2012

The Clash of Civilizations...Tandoori Style


           On February 11, 1990—in what seemed an utter impossibility at the time—42 to 1 underdog James “Buster” Douglas vanquished the then undefeated “Iron” Mike Tyson.  In his previous fight, Tyson had dispatched Carl “The Truth” Williams in 93 seconds, and we all knew something was wrong with “Iron” Mike when Douglas made it out of the first round. And the rest is groping for your mouth guard history
            I remember the fight, or rather my emotional reaction to the fight, vividly. Like just about everyone else in America at that time, I was captivated by the spectacle that is Mike Tyson. I knew next to nothing about the ‘sweet science’ but watched each of his fights with the fervor of a Roman at the Coliseum. I skipped rope, practiced upper cuts, wasted hours playing Nintendo’s Punch Out!, mastered an impression of the fighter’s high pitched lisp, purchased black Reebok high-tops, would’ve had lines carved in my ‘fro had I had a ‘fro. You name it….
Also, February 11th happens to be my birthday—I turned fifteen. 
But most importantly, my aunt got married that day in a small ceremony attended by only the bride and bridegroom, my grandparents, the groom’s brother and sister-in-law, my parents, my brother, and I. What’s that? Eleven people? I suppose there must’ve been a rabbi or minister of some sort, but I don’t really remember: I just wanted to get to the dang reception—which was going to be held at some fancy French restaurant in Santa Monica called Panache…whatever that meant—so that I could catch Tyson’s inevitable destruction of Buster Douglas. Oh, and one more thing notable about the ceremony: my new uncle, one Chander Oberoi, was Indian, as in East Asian Indian, and my aunt…well, she’s not.
Watercress soup.  Yuck.
            There had been a set menu, which saved us the trouble of having to order, and my father and I stole off to the bar to catch the fight. I returned to the table with a bad taste in my mouth to find that the first course had arrived: watercress soup. The dun fluid inhabited a broad shallow bowl. Outside of the dash of herb (parsely?) splashed in the middle, the soup looked like something Oliver Twist would have turned down.
“What the hell is this?” I asked staring at the bowl.
“Shhhhhhhh!” Hissed my mother. “It’s watercress soup. Just eat it.”
Man oh man, this night wasn’t getting any better. I picked up the spoon and took a sip. Dear God. The soup was cold, and it had less flavor than it had color. It was like pureed water chestnuts or something…only with less flavor than water chestnuts. And wasn’t the chief attraction of the water chestnut it’s crunchy texture?
“It’s cold!”
“It’s supposed to be cold. Quit complaining. There’s more food coming.”
“Yeah. Great. I can’t wait.” Needless to say, the remainder of the food was equally colorless, tasteless, and without texture. I later came to understand the restaurant’s moniker with a significant degree of irony.
Ya see, this was the end of a rather long week for me. I was fifteen and my grandparents were in from out-of-town and I had been forced to do nothing but the very thing that any 15 y/o worth their salt avoids at all costs: spending time with family. Yuck. I mean we’re talking a week straight with the most boring and embarrassing people on the face of the planet. My only companion in suffering was my 13 y/o little brother, Brandon, and he was even less equipped than I to deal with this trauma. His visage had assumed a sort of sublime gaze, a look not unlike the acceptance with which medieval martyrs must’ve ascended the gallows. In short, he was no help. To make matters worse, the GM is sleeping in my bed, the GF is in bro’s, and bro has called dibs on the couch. I’ve been relegated to some sort of pad thingy (which my mother politely refers to as a ‘futon’) on the living room floor. Each morning I wake up to find that I’ve been shoved off said pad by the aging family dog (who’s begun to smell like only an old dog can smell, btw).  But what’s the point of sleeping anyhow?  Ya see, my grandparents have to wake up at like 4:30 in the AM in order to get an early start on their arguing. “Where the hell is the newspaper?!”  “Why’d you make the coffee so strong?!”  “Clean up after yourself!” “Quiet down! Can’t you see people are trying to sleep?!”
Not to worry, during mealtimes, the grandparents are far more pleasant. Apparently, in my family, the patriarch feels that his place is founded on randomly informing his grandchildren that Roosevelt was justified in interning “the Japs” (that’s how the GF routinely referred to Japanese-Americans). “But, grampa, we didn’t intern German-American’s.” He dismissed my logic with a chortle and went back to shoveling potatoes into his mouth. 
Oh! And I had a Cute Little GirlFriend at the time, whom I’d had the opportunity to have over for precisely one (1) family dinner; she was the daughter of a well-off family headed by a judge, an African-American judge. Now at that point I was so utterly excited that a girl deigned to speak to me much less serve as the CLGF, that I could pretty much do nothing except think about her. “So, gramma, did you like, Rachel?” I should’ve known better. She informed me that she didn’t believe in the mixing of races. “But you’re Jewish!” She still didn’t believe in the mixing of races. “But you’re Jewish and grampa isn’t!”
“…”
“And, and, and, when you got married in like the 40s, the Nazi were off killing people…coz they were Jewish!”  She was shocked that I could compare dating “that Black girl” (that’s how she referred to my CLGF) to the horror that her people suffered in the holocaust. “Oh, brother.”
My brother and I circa 1990.
Of course, the GPs’ issue(s) with me was not the real issue, for I, their grandson, was merely dating someone who wasn’t white whereas their daughter was marrying an East Asian Indian.  In short, my grandparents approached this whole matrimonial process more like a normal and sane person would approach a funeral…and they were losing their fucking marbles…and driving the rest of us crazy in the process. My brother shuffled around like a mental patient on Thorazine, my mother exemplified a textbook case of the Stockholm syndrome, and my father had taken to heavy self-medication courtesy of Dr. Jack Daniels. So, as I finished off my cardboard tart at Panache, I’d decided that I’d had it. I was made as hell and I wasn’t going to take it anymore. Besides, the grandparents were going home in just two more days. I pushed the plate away, uttering, “Thank God this ordeal is about done with.”
“Yup,” said my mother. “Just the rehearsal dinner tomorrow and we can go back to our normal lives.”
“The what?”
“The rehearsal dinner?”
“I know I’m no expert when it comes to mating rituals,” I belted forth in a frenetic whine, “but don’t those normally come before the wedding?!”
“Yeah, well, we’ve got to recognize Chander’s family too. Finish your pie.”

*     *     *    *    *
So, the following afternoon, a Sunday, we’re all packed into my father’s Chevy Astrovan which is stuck in traffic along US Interstate-5 en route to some place inland from Compton and Long Beach called Artesia. Nice place. Turns out there’s a ‘Little India’ there, and that’s where Chander’s brother and sister-in-law have a starter-home. The GM, sitting shotgun, keeps harping on my father to slow down; rather than inform her that he’s in stop-and-go traffic and, therefore, not really moving much less driving fast, he just keeps one hand on the wheel and both eyes on the road. The bro and I place an over-under on how long it’ll be before he’ll snap. I take the under. In the van’s middle row, my mother nods at the GF's pontifications as he surveys East L.A. in much the same attitude that W. flew over the Gulf Coast post-Katrina. My brother is no longer capable of audible speech: at this point he mostly just drools.
Eventually we make it into Artesia, and we’re not in the barrio any more, Toto. It’s not like the upper-castes are ridding around on elephants or adolescent boys are hauling rickshaws or anything. But we are clearly in a realm that the GF cannot believe exists in these United States of America. A number of the shops have the word “market” on their deity-spangled signs—as in Taj Mahal Bengali Market or Sanjay’s Madras Market.  The storefronts are adorned with colorful saris and statuettes and hookah-looking-thingies. You can smell the curry spice in the air as the distant notes of sitars float over the hum of automobiles. The heat and dustiness of inland California make Artesia a plausible Hollywood substitute for New Delhi or Bombay…
And it’s becoming readily apparent that the grandparents had thought the worst was over, had thought that the wedding ceremony would prove the nadir of the trip, had thought that nothing could frighten them more than giving their daughter away to a man of another race, but they now find themselves right in the middle of the Other and are suffering full-scale anxiety attacks. My grandfather looks like he’s been drugged and awoken in a strange time and place; he’s Gulliver tethered to the Lilliputian beachhead. My grandmother can no longer even muster the energy to criticize my father’s driving. This is great.
That’s right. I’ve suffered. I’ve slept on the floor next to the elderly, foul-smelling cocker spaniel. I’ve awoken to daybreak arguments about such crucial topics as drinking the last of the grapefruit juice, burning the toast, and stealing the crossword puzzle. I’ve endured my grandfather’s unthinking racist claptrap. I’ve suffered my grandmother’s denigration of my Cute Little GirlFriend. And I have not been permitted to see the CLGF in days, days I say! Any protests on my part have been dismissed with no more than a wave of the hand. They’ve driven my brother and my parents insane, which only leads to further suffering on my part. And then I spent my birthday—my fifteenth birthday!—at a ceremony—a long and boring ceremony!—followed by a hoity-toity meal devoid of all taste and texture. To top it all off my hero—my heretofore undefeatable hero!—lost to a man named “Buster”! Did you hear that?  Buster! So, suffer! Suffer I say. It’s all I have left. I can no longer find joy in anything but the suffering of others. Why stop at Artesia? On to Bombay!
So, we meet up with Chander’s fam at a restaurant called something like Artesia Curry Palace.  All I know is I’m three courses away from being done with these people, after which I can get back to my happenin’ 15 y/o life. We’re seated in the way back and the mood at the long, banquet table is chilly to say the least. But I’ve checked out. I’m a short timer. And once I turn 16 and get my car I’m barely going to see anyone I’m related to ever again so help me god. So bring out the watercress soup or whatever it is you people are going to make me suffer through because in a few short hours you won’t have Aaron Proctor to kick around anymore. I’m at rock bottom and I’ve got nuthin’ to lose. Do your worst! Because I know, Grampa: I know that no matter how much I hate this food, you will hate it more.
I’m at one extreme end of the table and Chander and his brother are huddled with a soft-spoken server at the other extreme end.  I’m certain that the meal they’re ordering is meant as a form of cultural revenge upon the Proctor clan, and I’ve been warned by my mother that I am--under pain of death--required to, not only eat whatever they order, but actually pretend that I like it.  Soon after the conclusion of the confab, we are swarmed by servers dropping successive waves of small dishes, none resembling any food I’ve laid eyes upon heretofore.
Well, that’s not exactly true: the first dish, which Chander calls poppadums, resemble a sheet of tortilla chips that someone forgot to cut up prior to frying.  These poppadums are accompanied by bowls of sauces called chutneys. Even those these chutneys don’t look like any salsa from Tacos Jalisco, the parents set to, comforting themselves verbally with “just like chips and salsa.”  Of course, the grandparents take little comfort in the supposed familiarity of Mexican food. And those chutneys are wonderful. There are mango chutneys and pickled chutneys, and citrus chutneys and spicy chutneys and sweet chutneys. Some are smooth and some are chunky.  Some are red and others are yellow or green. And they all smell of the spice gardens of the world. 
And before I’ve time to come up for air I’m eating fried bits of chicken and cheese and vegetables, but they’re not just fried: they’ve got this infusion of spices which are all subtly different in both taste and smell. And then there are beds of rices, long-grain odoriferous basmati rices which breathe saffron and jasmine. Baskets of bread arrive, naan bread, a clay oven baked flat bread.  They’re covered with butter and garlic and tandoori and have chicken or cheese or vegetables in them.  And I’m ladling gravies—coconut curries, tikka masalas, mahknis, rogan joshes, madras curries, vindaloos, and even a fahl—each spicier than the last, all of which surround more chicken and lamb and cheese and shrimp and nuts and potatoes and peas and lentils. My mouth is on fire, a sublime fire, a fire of ecstasy. And, as I shovel it in like only a 15 y/o boy can shovel it in (and after a week of subsistence on a GP-friendly diet), I suddenly realize that everyone is looking at me.
My mother has a small mound (mostly white rice) in the middle of her plate which she’s been pushing back and forth.  My father and brother have been making faces at their larger heaps.  My grandfather has a single bit of pompadum on his plate and my grandmother has—like Gandhi—refused to eat anything, has thrown all concern for decorum to the wind, has in fact sent her plate away so that her resolve on this issue may not be questioned.  And they’re all looking at me, even the members of East Asian Indian delegation, with uniform blank stares of astonishment.  In retrospect, it seems likely Chander’s family was merely shocked at the sheer amount of food I had ingested whereas my family was coming to grips with the fact that I actually liked this food, this James “Buster” Douglas of world cuisine. I set my fork down and wiped my mouth with a linen napkin.
“Hey, it beats the hell out of watercress soup.”
“…”
“Seriously? You don’t like this?”
“He’s a weird kid,” my grandfather proclaimed.
“Whatever. More for me.”  And I dug back in….

Monday, January 2, 2012

It's Not Easy Being Green...

Last week my daughter had a midmorning dental appointment, and, rather than take her back to daycare, I decided to spend some quality time with her in a futile attempt to lessen her resentment toward me in her adolescent years. A seemingly congenital resentment towards one’s parents is about as close as the Proctors get to a family heirloom.
While this December has proven quite mild, it seemed a bit too cold to tolerate a bike ride or trip to the playground—too cold for me, that is—the little ‘uns have an innocent imperviousness to the elements more akin to the Neanderthal than Homo Sapiens.  So, to make a long story short, I decided to take her to a matinee. Now I was hoping to get her to agree to see The Muppets again.  I know, I know: it wasn’t as good as The Muppet Movie or even The Great Muppet Caper, but have you been to a children’s movie lately?  Hell, have you been to a grownup movie lately? Who was it that said you would never lose money underestimating the intelligence of the American public?  Well, Hollywood has proven that axiom true…for the most part.  And Li’l Stinky was not interested in going with me to watch Kermie make time with Piggy again. Hmm. Maybe I should quit obsessively singing “Rainbow Connection” in my more than slightly askew Kermit voice. The loverrrrs, the dreamerrrrs, and meeeeee!!!! Anyhow, her refusal now pitted father against daughter in some fierce negotiations.